Personal tools
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Recently visited
Related items
You are here: Home Resources Further reading News Modifying Peru

Modifying Peru

Sep 09, 2011: Last month the people of Peru marched on Lima, campaigning against GMOs. Each year around 100,000 tourists visit Peru to sample its renowned cuisine and even more are expected this year to attend Mistura 2011, an international food fair promoting organic produce as well as rustic Peruvian cuisine.
Modifying Peru

Photo: Elie Gardner

Roland Arellano suggests that some ‘high-income tourists’ come for a few days just so they can taste Lima’s famous cuisine. Peru’s gastronomy circuit could generate revenue of up to 13,000 million Euros during the festival, and with many of the tourists coming from neighbouring Chile and Ecuador, the majority within the industry rely on tourism. Without the attraction of healthy, GM free organic produce, such food fairs will have lost their showcase ingredients.

In September 2004, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) developed a framework to promote the worldwide consumption of fruit and vegetables. In times of climate change, with a growing population, they have been promoting the use of genetically modified crops that are better suited to extreme climatic conditions to improve the nutritional value of agricultural products and help alleviate hunger. However the Independent Science Panel (ISP) has criticised the FAO for its qualified backing of genetically modified (GM) crops in the global fight against hunger.

The FAO seems to ignore the implicit message of its own study (The State of Food and Agriculture), that GM crops have thus far delivered negligible benefits to the World´s poor. There is little indication that these trends will change in favour of the poor. With this in mind, and with the constant threat of water scarcity in Peru, the country’s minister of Agriculture has raised 8 main proposals for Agriculture, one of which is to implement a moratorium on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).

In the wake of the 2008 food price increase, enough food was produced to provide the Peruvian population with 2,700 calories per day, more than the recommended daily intake. In Peru, fruit and vegetables rotted in the absence of adequate transport and roads, a signal that hunger is not always a result of a lack of food, because it persists even when there is a surplus. Currently, almost a third of Peruvians do not get enough to eat. Also the ever increasing threat of climate change makes it difficult for farmers to survive. This is a reason why farmers might choose to plant GM seeds, having been promised more resistant, less water intensive crops, which produce larger yields, from companies such as Monsanto, a specialist in agricultural biology and the leading worldwide GM seed provider, which has been the spear head of GM seeds entering Peru.

Due to a previous lack of labelling laws, GM products such as chicken were, and still are, commonly eaten by much of the World’s population, many of whom are unlikely to be aware of the possible consequences. The International Journal of Biological Sciences notes that a recent study has linked some varieties of GM corn to kidney and liver damage in laboratory rats. With this in mind, the 10 year moratorium on GMOs in Peru has come too late. Even with new labelling laws it will still prove difficult to identify GM products, especially considering the ease of flight and transference between farms. This could suggest that organic crops will in the future be contaminated with pollen or seeds from GMOs.

Cross Pollination has already occurred due to the assistance of the wind and insects, and in sharing a border with Brazil, a top GMO producer, Peru will inevitably be home to GMOs, whether it wants to or not. Notwithstanding the potential impacts on health, the ensuing chain reaction and the spread of GMOs could have any number of environmental consequences.

A four-year study at the University of Jena in Germany conducted by Hans-Hinrich Kaatz revealed that bees ingesting pollen from transgenic rapeseed had bacteria in their gut with modified genes. These genes however, can mutate. Mutations may also be able to travel internally to other cells, tissue systems and organs throughout the human body. This is “not to be underestimated the potential domino effect of internal and external genetic pollution can make the substance of science-fiction horror movies become terrible realities in the future.” Sadly this is only one of the dozens of the side-effects of genetically modifying organisms.

Despite Immanuel Wallerstein’s claim that “years of uncertainty and global chaos are coming”, Peru’s agricultural sector should have cause for hope. As well as the Moratorium on GMOs the Minister of Agriculture has also called for more support for farmers, the strengthening of technological innovation in agriculture and an agricultural census, which may help track GM foods, making labelling of products more straightforward. However one can’t help but feel that the damage may have already been done, not just to Peru, but to the World.

The Western World has been consuming GM foods for over 10 years and the effects of this may be irreversible. Lim Li Ching from the ISP suggests that “if the world is to seriously address hunger, this means rethinking agriculture and associated policy making, and exploring how traditional knowledge and science can work together, while learning from farmers themselves.”

Further reading:

Text: Jonathan Moody

Document Actions
Filed under: , ,
Teobaldo Pinzas
Teobaldo Pinzas says:
Sep 12, 2011 05:54 PM

A very interesting article with plenty of information. Peruvian consumers are eating food made/raised with GM inputs but so far there is no cultivation of GM crops. This is why it is so important that the ban on GM seeds be approved in the congress.

teresa gianella
teresa gianella says:
Sep 12, 2011 11:42 PM

The battle is hard and to producers and consumers need to be thoroughly informed about GMO nature and its impact on the ecology and economy of producers and consumers in the countries that harbor great biodiversity, and are centers of origin of agriculture. So, congratulations to Jonathan Moody for this article 'Modifying Peru'.
Fortunately, increased awareness of consumers and peasant farmers on the need to be alert to the strong penetration of genetically modified organisms in the large scale production of food crops and poultry industry . The current government of Peru has taken valuable steps as the moratorium for the entrance of GMO to Peru and the labeling of commercial food products . The problem lies in the ability to lobby from transnational corporations, more powerful than many of the Latin America states, which is strong and aggressive and has on its side some scientists using three major arguments to defend GMO pro facts: i) the use of GMO to produce in an inexpensive large scale way to meet growing food demands of the populations in developing countries; ii) use of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering innovations in agricultural production in the South, contributes to poverty reduction and to face climate change threats, and iii) the production of ecological or organic does not guarantee healthy quality of food (often GMO defenders use many examples from around the world to illustrate this apparent fallacy of organic production) .

james
james says:
Sep 22, 2011 01:49 PM

I wouldnt mind all the lobbies, as long as there is open information. Why is it that who lobby most are the ones more interested in keeping everyone in the dark?

Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting.

(Required)