Personal tools
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
You are here: Home Magazines Global edition Soils for life Perspectives: Restoring our soils by learning from history

Perspectives: Restoring our soils by learning from history

Written by Roland Bunch last modified Jun 30, 2016 12:02 PM

Most of our ideas about soils ignore the millions of years before mankind started farming. But what happened during the 99.9% of a soil’s history contains very important lessons. So let us celebrate the International Year of Soils by looking at what that history can tell us – and build on those lessons for the future.

Farming Matters | 31.1 | March 2015

Living soils, the result of green manure cover crops

Soil fertility has become the primary limiting factor for the world’s smallholder farmers.

In the tropical world, fallowing kept farmers’ soils fertile for thousands of years by providing 70 to 95% of their soil organic matter. But today, since most smallholder farmers possess less than 2 hectares of land, in a large part because of population growth, fallowing is in its death throes. As a result, the developing world is experiencing a severe soil organic matter crisis.

The soil organic matter crisis is critical because soils are being so rapidly damaged and depleted, because soil fertility has become the primary limiting factor for the world’s smallholder farmers, and because restoring the soil is a ‘foundational technology’. If a farmer adopts a new cassava variety, it may improve his or her cassava production, but it will do almost nothing for the farmer’s maize, bean, vegetable or animal production. But if the farmer successfully improves her or his soil, it will have a major impact on everything else, too. Foundational technologies, such as soil restoration, can therefore provide the basis for the sustainable, long-term development of an entire farm.

Three myths

In Honduras, farmers experimenting with green manure cover crops produced over five times more maize when intercropping with mucuna. Photo: Roland Bunch
Photo: Roland Bunch

Looking at soil history will debunk three commonly held myths about soil restoration. The first myth is that productive soils will inevitably deteriorate over time. For instance, in all long-term experiments carried out in Africa, even those including chemical fertilizer, decreasing fertility was found. This loss of fertility correlated with decreasing soil organic matter levels and the resulting availability of nutrients. But humid tropical forests the world over, by maintaining the soil organic matter content, have maintained impressively high levels of biomass productivity for millions of years, with no fertilizers and often on very infertile soils.

The second common belief to go out the window is that soils need to be ploughed to stay friable and productive. Tropical forest soils were never ploughed, yet after millions of years they are far more friable and naturally productive than most agricultural soils. In fact, family farmers who convert forest land rarely plough it during the first year. Doing so would be ‘like ploughing the sea’, as Simón Bolívar once remarked. Rarely do we need to plough land unless we have previously degraded it.

The third myth is that good modern farmers must use monocrops. But tropical forests maintain biodiversity and thereby increase soil quality and productivity. And the oft-repeated claim that phosphorus will limit productivity because of the phosphorus lost in grain harvests is based on seriously faulty nutrient assessment studies. Furthermore, crops grown with a biodiverse mulch will feed directly from the mulch, just as tropical forests do. In this situation, most phosphorus in annual crops spends 1-8 months in the mulch before being taken up by the crop, and after less than a year, will once again return to the mulch. In contrast, only 10% of chemical phosphorus applied to soils is used the first year, about 5% the second year, and less each year thereafter. Therefore, with a biodiverse mulch, each atom of phosphorus can produce about 15 times more biomass than it can from fertilizer.

A movement that transformed agriculture

Interestingly, and not at all by chance, three of these lessons from history coincide with the three principles of the Conservation Agriculture movement that began in Brazil in the early 1980s. These are (1) plough the soil as little as possible, (2) keep the soil covered, and (3) maintain biodiversity.

In 35 years, this movement has transformed the agriculture of 3 million farmers on 30 million hectares in Brazil and Paraguay, and has spread to some 30 other nations. Farmers’ yields have doubled or tripled, reaching up to eight tonnes per hectare of maize. Between 1992 and 2012, the same one litre of diesel came to produce seven times more grain. Over a 22-year period, Conservation Agriculture has resulted in soils with higher levels of organic matter and available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium, and with lower acidity. In the meantime, the per-hectare use of nitrogenous chemical fertilizer has fallen. In long term experiments, Conservation Agriculture produced a 64% increase in organic carbon in the top 10 cm of the soil. Needless to say, the world desperately needs more such successes.

Conservation Agriculture’s increasing yields also show that we do not need to resort to subsidised chemical fertilizer – subsidies that are tremendously expensive. The current President of Zambia told me that with what the government spent on fertilizer subsidies in the last few years, they could have built a school in every village across the country. Furthermore, cheap fertilizer reduces the incentives of farmers to produce the biomass that will improve their soil in the longterm. That is, all this wasted money not only cannot solve the basic, underlying problem of soil depletion, instead, it makes it worse.

The three principles of Conservation Agriculture

Plough the soil as little as possible. This is also known as no-till, zero tillage or minimum tillage. This practice maintains soil structure, reduces damage to soil organisms, reduces soil losses to erosion, reduces loss of organic matter and nitrogen and saves labor and expenses. On the other hand, weed control will suffer without ploughing, and farmers using animal traction may need to start using new equipment.

Keep the soil covered. Mulching prevents erosion, provides a constant, well-balanced source of nutrients, protects the soil from the hot sun, greatly reduces soil moisture losses, and helps control weeds. The main problem in maintaining year-round soil cover is that crop residues are seldom sufficient.

Maintain biodiversity and use green manure/ cover crops. In Conservation Agriculture, farmers use rotations and intercropping to maintain biodiversity. These practices reduce the risk of pests and diseases, support soil micro-organisms and use water and nutrients in the whole soil profile more effectively. An essential component of such a system are green manure/cover crops. These are defined as any plant, whether a tree, bush, vine or crawler, that fertilizes the soil or controls weeds. They include multi-purpose grain legumes and can often provide high-protein food for sale or consumption. Unlike traditional green manures, they are rarely cut down in the flowering stage and are rarely ploughed into the soil. They can thereby control the increased weed problem caused by lack of tillage and produce plenty of in situ biomass to keep the soil covered.

Legumes as green manure/ cover crops

Green manure/cover crops are crucial. It is often said that nature can only produce a few centimetres of topsoil in 100 years, but experience in country after country has shown that farmers using green manure/cover crops can produce a centimetre of topsoil every three to four years. In fact, when using edible legume species, the value of the grain often exceeds the costs of production, so the net cost of restoring soil fertility over decades is actually negative. Chemical fertilizer will never compete with that price! But fertilizer can supplement green manure/cover crops. When smallholder soils reach a productivity of about 3 tonnes per hectare, fertilizers can be profitably used. At this level of soil productivity, the fertilizer will produce a greater yield response with lower risks.

Experience around the world shows that it takes about 20 to 25 tonnes per hectare per year (green weight) of leguminous biomass to maintain soil fertility over time. Never in 40 years have I heard of a smallholder farmer using 20 tonnes of fresh compost or animal manure each year. Most smallholder farmers don’t have enough animals to produce this amount of manure, and composting requires too much labour to be cost effective for most subsistence crops. But dozens of legumes can produce double or triple this amount of biomass. Runner beans (Phaseolus coccineus) and mucuna (Mucuna spp.) can easily produce 70 tonnes per hectare per year, lablab beans (Dolichos lablab) and jackbeans (Canavalia ensiformis) 50 to 60 tonnes per hectare per year, and pigeon peas (Cajanus cajan), densely planted, can produce about 30 tonnes.

An estimated 25 000 people, between Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala and Belize, have been using mucuna as a green manure cover crop for over 50 years. Photo: Roland Bunch
An estimated 25 000 people, between Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala and Belize, have been using mucuna as a green manure cover crop for over 50 years. Photo: Roland Bunch

Dispersed shade

Some farmers are adding trees as ‘dispersed shade’ to their Conservation Agriculture. The trees’ light shade reduces the excessive midday heat that decreases crop productivity in the lowland tropics. Trees are also extremely drought resistant because of their deep root systems; the fertilizing leaves are out of reach of free-grazing animals; trees preserve moisture in the soil through lowered soil surface temperatures and reduced wind velocity; and they can provide firewood and fodder. Furthermore, as climate change occurs, farmers can merely cut fewer branches off their trees, so the crops underneath will continue to enjoy optimum ambient temperatures. Two important species from tropical America and dryland Africa, respectively, are Gliricidia sepium and Faidherbia albida.

Interestingly, Conservation Agriculture with trees is ecologically about as close as one can get to producing food in a forest. In 35 years of intensive learning, we’ve travelled right back to where mankind started thousands of years ago.

Roland Bunch

Roland Bunch is an independent consultant and the author of Restoring the Soil, A Guide for Using Green Manure/Cover Crops to Improve the Food Security of Smallholder Farmers (Winnipeg: Canadian Foodgrains Bank, 2012).

Related content
Document Actions
  • Print this Print this
coach outlert
coach outlert says:
Sep 24, 2016 11:41 AM

Coach's popularity has Coach Outlet Online 70% OFF.One spiked - Coach Outlet in the last few year, and that's made the brand's fans very interesting to follow on social media. The brand's accessories profile first surged in the mid-to-late-2000s on the strength of the Paddington, Silverado Coach Outlet Stores and Paraty Coach bags, but after Phoebe Philo's departure, it took Coach Factory Outlet 2016 a few years to regain its status as an assured Coach Factory hitmaker. Thankfully, those days have returned with super-popular bags like the Drew, Faye and Hudson debuting seemingly every season.

The michael kors outlet thread on our PurseForum is filled with devotees of the brand's designs. Our followers showcase their love by revealing their latest handbag purchases or by toting around old Coach Factory Outlet favorites Coach Outlet Online US like the Bay Bag or Silverado. Whether you prefer old Coach USA Store or new michael kors, one thing's for sure: our Coach Outlet - Purseforum members favor them all!

Get ready for a trip down memory lane in this latest PurseForum roundup, and check out all our favorites from the Your Coach in Action thread!

The Peekaboo debuted in 2009, and at first, it did what freshly debuted designer bags normally do: the Peekaboo enjoyed a couple years of popularity and then got rotated to the back of the lineup in favor of whatever Next Big Things the brand had in the pipeline. Generally, that’s followed by a bag being mostly ignored and then eventually put out to pasture quietly, when people are unlikely to notice its eventually absence. Instead of that slow march into the sunset, Fendi decided to reintroduce the Peekaboo and shoppers ate it up.

It’s not unheard of for brands to try and re-promote a bag CHI Flat Iron that was once very popular, but it rarely works. Shoppers want novelty, and most bags that are eligible for re-promotion just don’t have the enduring appeal necessary to feel fresh instead of dated when a customer Coach Outlet USA Coach Outle sees them again, five years down the road. The Peekaboo has already passed that test with flying colors, and there’s not reason to think it won’t stick around for a long time.

Also worth noting is the Peekaboo’s positioning within Fendi’s lineup; the bag is the brand’s most expensive, on average, and bags that become enduring classics usually hold that spot in their designers’ collections. After all, if a design is destined for greatness, it should at least be the best in its class. For instance, the one you see above can be yours for $3,550 via Net-a-Porter.

Celebs are all uggs outlet over the globe this week, and yet their bag choices are oddly in sync. Bags from Fendi and Saint Laurent are obvious faves, and a hot new style from ugg boots hut has just made one of its first appearances on the site and you're sure to have an opinion about it one way or another. In related news, Reese Witherspoon remains surprisingly loyal to her favorite Salvatore Ferragamo style, and Solange Knowles brought a mystery bag to Beyoncé's b-day party. If you can properly identify it for us, we will crown you as our leader.

Beyond that, most of the episode was spent in preparation to go to Glamis. Much ado was made about Heather’s fancy camper that she needed because she’s a princess who just can’t spend a night in a regular RV like Tamra and her plebe family, as well as the foil packets her private chef prepared for her so she could just toss them on the grill without having to operate a salt shaker or cut a vegetable.

The results of Heather’s expenses and efforts were an RV that did not look especially more spacious or comfortable than the others on the inside, but was far shinier on the outside, as well as a meal that tasted probably about the same as everybody else’s because Heather doesn’t know how to use a grill. Heather also seemed to recognize that her special, expensive RV wasn’t stunting quite as hard on the others as she wold have preferred, though, but she didn’t explain why she didn’t have her assistant find her an even better RV instead of just taking Tamra’s recommendation. Good help is so hard to find! Even in costars.

After a long holiday weekend, it’s time to get back to the swing of things, and what better way to ease the transition than with a roundup of dreamy Coach bags? You all know I’m a big fan of Coach, but I’m not the only one who shares a deep and abiding love for the brand. In our weekly celebrity style roundups, we always see celebs toting various Coach bags, and it’s hard not to swoon over the brand’s light structured, minimalist designs. But celebs aren’t the only loyal Coach fans; plenty of our Instagram followers showcase their love for the bags on a daily basis, and we’re here to share some of our favorites from recent days.

Finding Coach bags on Instagram is easy thanks to several dedicated hashtags many avid Coach followers use, such as: #celine, #celineaddict, #celinebag, #celineparis–you get the idea. While Coach’s signature bags under Phoebe Philo may be the Luggage and Trapeze bags, many of our followers love those signature styles right alongside many of the brand’s under-the-radar bags. Get ready to see lots of Classic Box Bags, Trapeze Bags and much more below.

Buy the Coach of your dreams via Bluefly and Vestiaire Collective!

Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting.